What is the meaning of Life?
Have you ever looked up into the sky and wondered, "What is the purpose of life?,
Why are we all here? What is it all about?"
As Above, So Below
Matthew 6:10
Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
World's Leading Darwinian Evolutionary and Agnostic Scientist, Richard Dawkins Admits:
No One Knows How Life on Earth Began
Do You Believe in a Universal Consciousness?
"The physical world / universe exists, in large part, due to duality and the interaction and balance of these opposing / complementary forces. Light - Dark; North - South, Positive - Negative; Right - Wrong, On - Off, Yin - Yang, 1 – 0, Day - Night, Order - Disorder, Good - Evil, Up - Down, True - False, Male - Female, Hot - Cold, Wave - Particle, etc. is observed to be interwoven within the fabric of the "physical world/universe". Thus, the existence of Good would of necessity require the existence of Evil in the physical world / universe, and vice versa. Moreover, the scientifically confirmed property of duality in the physical world / universe would seem to indicate, through the inherent laws that govern it, the existence of a Prime Observer / Cause."
--- Rod Dacanay
--- Rod Dacanay
Atheist World Order Manifesto to Counter any Science that Infers the Existence of God
"The problem is that ‘Ideological / Worldview Agenda’ (using deceptively manipulated data, misinformation, and disinformation pushed with propaganda) can masquerade as "Science"
in some of the most fundamental and important areas in society."
--- Rod Dacanay
in some of the most fundamental and important areas in society."
--- Rod Dacanay
Over the millennia, connotations of the word "God" have become so deteriorated. The terms Consciousness / Mind / Intelligence seem more scientifically relevant for these types of discussions. It seems that the concept of God is not experimentally testable. However, evidence for the effects of Consciousness / Mind / Intelligence are scientifically demonstrable.
The illogical, irrational, and unreasonable position of claiming that there is No Universal Mind Consciousness Intelligence / (i.e. Atheism):
The fallacy is the assumption that something is true (i.e. Universal Mind Consciousness Intelligence does not exist) unless proven otherwise. The Claimant making a negative claim (i.e. Universal Mind Consciousness Intelligence does not exist) cannot logically, rationally, and reasonably prove nonexistence. Because, for a Claimant to know that X does not exist would require the Claimant to possess 100% knowledge of all things with 100% certainty and 100% accuracy (i.e. omniscience).
Even mainstream secular scientists claim that approx. 95% of the Universe is still unknown (i.e. Dark Energy and Dark Matter). Of the remaining 5% of the Universe, only 0.0035% exists within the visible light spectrum which the human eye is capable of observing. Moreover, of all that is made of atoms and capable of being observed in this "Material" universe, 99.999999999% is actually empty space (i.e. "Non-material"). Therefore, there is much, much more that humanity does not know about the Universe and Reality than it does know. Based on just this information, the position of claiming to be Atheist is shown to be illogical, irrational and unreasonable.
Many people have taken the position of being Atheist by claiming a moral stand that they can’t believe in the Bible because the God of the Old Testament was genocidal for eliminating the Baal followers. Yet, have those same people considered what Baal followers do? Baal worshipers destroy countless human off-spring in offerings to Baal. This atrocious act, in and of itself, would eventually lead to the genocide of the entire human race, if everyone were a Baal follower. The purpose of nature and humanity, as confirmed by science, is propagation of species, i.e. to “be fruit and multiply”. This could not be accomplished in the human species under a Baal ideology / worldview. Because, the Baal ideology / worldview commits eventual death of the human species. Even science and medicine have made the moral claim that anything causing the death of the human species is considered bad / evil. So, in the war against the death of the human species, even scientists and medical practitioners destroy the genes of the bad / evil bacteria and viruses, just as the God of the Biblical Old Testament brought judgment upon the Baal followers. Moreover, science and medicine have confirmed that even in nature, Light (UV) destroys bad / evil bacteria and viruses, just as Light also removes Darkness.
“… Every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.” Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955), founder of modern physics (Theory of Relativity inter alia) and 1921 Nobel prize winner.
The fact that DNA / genes (biological coded information) exists at all shows that a Consciousness-'Intelligence-Mind' is involved in the initial introduction and subsequent propagation of living systems. Un-directed random material natural processes have never been observed in nature or experimentally demonstrated to be capable of producing Functional / Coded / Digital information such as that required for biological systems, even at the most primitive levels of biological life.
"Language: All Digital communications require a formal language, which in this context consists of all the information that the sender and receiver of the digital communication must both possess, in advance, in order for the communication to be successful."_* (Wikipedia: Digital Data) Inherent in DNA is language. Language is scientifically proven to be the product of only Mind/ Consciousness / Intelligence.
Laws of the Universe exist Independent of anyone's personal beliefs in the existence of the Laws of the Universe. Just as man-made laws govern society globally, Universal Laws govern the entire Universe. Un-directed random material natural processes have never been observed in nature or experimentally demonstrated to be capable of producing any form of laws. As scientifically confirmed, non-material laws are the product of only Mind / Consciousness / Intelligence.
During his conversation with the Archbishop of Canterbury and Dr. Rowan Williams, Dr. Richard Dawkins admitted, “I can't be sure God does not exist." --- Quoted in The Telegraph, in 2012-02-24 (Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the world's foremost expert on Darwinian Evolution. He has also been described as the “World’s Most Famous Atheist.” However, over the years, Dawkins now describes himself as Agnostic.)
Genesis 1:3-4
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
1 John 1:5
This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
Psalm 14:1
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Romans 1:20
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Genesis 1:3-4
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
1 John 1:5
This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
Psalm 14:1
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Romans 1:20
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
True, valid, and complete science will always confirm the Creator. False and incomplete science, or "science falsely so called" will not. Even as there are still people today who believe that the earth is flat and is the center of the universe, in spite of all of the scientific evidence to the contrary, there will always exist people who cling to the theory that humans evolved from the primordial ocean. Note: Did you know that Darwin never even addresses creation (i.e. how, when, or where the first living organism came into being) in his book, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life". Darwin's theory focuses on how already existing living simple organisms may be able to evolve into more complex organisms over time. In fact, Charles Darwin was only a 22 year old amateur naturalist when, during a 5 year world voyage (1831-1836) aboard the HMS Beagle, he traveled to the Galapagos Islands, from September 16 to October 20, 1835, where he spent just over 1 month and made his observations of nature, the beaks of finch birds in particular, from which he would later develop the theories he wrote about in his book, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life".
1 Corinthians 1:21
For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
One of the accepted mainstream scientific theories at the time, which is believed to have influenced Darwin's work, was the Theory of Spontaneous Generation. The Theory of Spontaneous Generation (redefined in Modern Era as Abiogenesis) was "coherently synthesized" by the philosopher and scientist Aristotle in the 300's B.C. It is the hypothetical process by which living organisms developed from non-living matter and was utilized to explain the origin of life. The Theory of Spontaneous Generation was the prevailing scientific belief addressing the origin of life and lasted from about 300 B.C. til the 1800's, over 2000 years, until it was disproved in the late 1800's by the experiments of Louis Pasteur and others. It is good to keep in mind the relatively primitive nature of "science" from the 300's B.C. til the 1800's. The "science" of Darwin's time was not even aware of the fundamental structure of a single cell, something which is considered common knowledge in today's science. Truly, Darwin's conclusions of his observations of nature for about 1 month in 1835 could more accurately be described as "Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection of the Galapagos Island Finch Bird Beaks". Instead, his conclusions seem to have become "Darwin's Theory of the Origin and Common Ancestry through Evolution of ALL Life by Chance Random Mutations and Natural Selection". Darwinian Evolutionary theory is based on two principles: 1) Un-directed Random Mutation (i.e. chance) and 2 ) Natural Selection.
Modern Quantum Physics has shown that reality is based on probability:
A statistical impossibility is defined as “a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 1/10^50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a Rational, Reasonable argument." The probability of finding one particular atom out of all of the atoms in the universe has been estimated to be 1/10^80. The probability of just one (1) functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 1/10^164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 1/10^119,000. The probability of random chance protein-protein linkages in a cell is 1/10^79,000,000,000. Based on just these three cellular components, it would be far more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the cell was not formed by un-directed random natural processes. Note: Abiogenesis Hypothesis posits that un-directed random natural processes, i.e. random chance formation, of molecules led to living organisms. Natural selection has no effect on individual atoms and molecules on the micro scale in a prebiotic environment. (*For reference, peptides/proteins can vary in size from 3 amino acid chains to 34,000 amino acid chains. Some scientists consider 300-400 amino acid protein chains to be the average size. There are 42,000,000 protein molecules in just one (1) simple cell, each protein requiring precise assembly. There are approx. 30,000,000,000,000 cells in the human body.)
Of all the physical laws and constants, just the Cosmological Constant alone is tuned to a level of 1/10^120; not to mention the fine-tuning of the Mass-Energy distribution of early universe which is 1/10^10^123. Therefore, in the fine-tuning argument, it would be more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the multi-verse is not the correct answer. On the other hand, it has been scientifically proven numerous times that Consciousness does indeed collapse the wave function to cause information waves of probability/potentiality to become particle/matter with 1/1 probability. A rational and reasonable person could therefore conclude that the answer is consciousness.
A "Miracle" is considered to be an event with a probability of occurrence of 1/10^6. Abiogenesis, RNA World Hypothesis, and Multiverse would all far, far, far exceed any "Miracle". Yet, these extremely irrational and unreasonable hypotheses are what some of the world’s top scientists ‘must’ believe in because of a prior commitment to a strictly arbitrary, subjective, biased, narrow, limiting, materialistic ideology / worldview.
Every idea, number, concept, thought, theory, mathematical equation, abstraction, qualia, etc. existing within and expressed by anyone is "Immaterial" or "Non-material". The very idea or concept of "Materialism" is an immaterial entity and by it's own definition does not exist. Modern science seems to be stuck in archaic, subjective, biased, incomplete ideologies that have inadequately attempted to define the "nature of reality" or the "reality of nature" for millennia. A Paradigm Shift in ‘Science’ is needed for humanity to advance. A major part of this Science Paradigm Shift would be the formal acknowledgment by the scientific community of the existence of "Immaterial" or "Non-material" entities as verified and confirmed by observation of the universe and discoveries in Quantum Physics.)
A statistical impossibility is defined as “a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 1/10^50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a Rational, Reasonable argument." The probability of finding one particular atom out of all of the atoms in the universe has been estimated to be 1/10^80. The probability of just one (1) functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 1/10^164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 1/10^119,000. The probability of random chance protein-protein linkages in a cell is 1/10^79,000,000,000. Based on just these three cellular components, it would be far more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the cell was not formed by un-directed random natural processes. Note: Abiogenesis Hypothesis posits that un-directed random natural processes, i.e. random chance formation, of molecules led to living organisms. Natural selection has no effect on individual atoms and molecules on the micro scale in a prebiotic environment. (*For reference, peptides/proteins can vary in size from 3 amino acid chains to 34,000 amino acid chains. Some scientists consider 300-400 amino acid protein chains to be the average size. There are 42,000,000 protein molecules in just one (1) simple cell, each protein requiring precise assembly. There are approx. 30,000,000,000,000 cells in the human body.)
Of all the physical laws and constants, just the Cosmological Constant alone is tuned to a level of 1/10^120; not to mention the fine-tuning of the Mass-Energy distribution of early universe which is 1/10^10^123. Therefore, in the fine-tuning argument, it would be more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the multi-verse is not the correct answer. On the other hand, it has been scientifically proven numerous times that Consciousness does indeed collapse the wave function to cause information waves of probability/potentiality to become particle/matter with 1/1 probability. A rational and reasonable person could therefore conclude that the answer is consciousness.
A "Miracle" is considered to be an event with a probability of occurrence of 1/10^6. Abiogenesis, RNA World Hypothesis, and Multiverse would all far, far, far exceed any "Miracle". Yet, these extremely irrational and unreasonable hypotheses are what some of the world’s top scientists ‘must’ believe in because of a prior commitment to a strictly arbitrary, subjective, biased, narrow, limiting, materialistic ideology / worldview.
Every idea, number, concept, thought, theory, mathematical equation, abstraction, qualia, etc. existing within and expressed by anyone is "Immaterial" or "Non-material". The very idea or concept of "Materialism" is an immaterial entity and by it's own definition does not exist. Modern science seems to be stuck in archaic, subjective, biased, incomplete ideologies that have inadequately attempted to define the "nature of reality" or the "reality of nature" for millennia. A Paradigm Shift in ‘Science’ is needed for humanity to advance. A major part of this Science Paradigm Shift would be the formal acknowledgment by the scientific community of the existence of "Immaterial" or "Non-material" entities as verified and confirmed by observation of the universe and discoveries in Quantum Physics.)
"The fact that DNA / genes (biological coded information) exists at all shows that an 'Intelligence' is involved in the initial introduction and subsequent propagation of living systems. Un-directed random natural processes have never been observed or scientifically demonstrated to be capable of producing FUNCTIONAL / CODED / DIGITAL information as that required for biological systems,
even at the most primitive levels of biological life." --- Rod Dacanay
even at the most primitive levels of biological life." --- Rod Dacanay
DNA code can be equated to a type of computer language. DNA code is more complex than regular computer language in that it is not binary (based on 0 and 1). It is quaternary (based on A T C G: and, as with every known language in existence, confirmed through scientific experiment and observation, is the product of only one thing ... mind/ consciouness /intelligence. ...
”The instructions in a gene that tell the cell how to make a specific protein. A, C, G, and T are the 'letters' of the DNA code; they stand for the chemicals adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T), respectively, that make up the nucleotide bases of DNA. Each gene's code combines the four chemicals in various ways to spell out three-letter "words" that specify which amino acid is needed at every step in making a protein.”* ( “Genetic Code" - National Human Genome Research Institute. Genome.gov)
”Genetic code is the term we use for the way that the four bases of DNA--the A, C, G, and Ts--are strung together in a way that the cellular machinery, the ribosome, can read them and turn them into a protein. In the genetic code, each three nucleotides in a row count as a triplet and code for a single amino acid. So each sequence of three codes for an amino acid. And proteins are made up of sometimes hundreds of amino acids. So the code that would make one protein could have hundreds, sometimes even thousands, of triplets contained in it.”_* (Lawrence C. Brody, Ph.D., Genome.gov)
"The discovery of the structure of DNA transformed biology profoundly, catalysing the sequencing of the human genome and engendering a new view of biology as an INFORMATION SCIENCE. Two features of DNA structure account for much of its remarkable impact on science: its DIGITAL nature and its complementarity, whereby one strand of the helix binds perfectly with its partner. DNA has two types of DIGITAL INFORMATION — the genes that ENCODE proteins, which are the MOLECULAR MACHINES of life, and the GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS that specify the behaviour of the genes." (Source: Nature Journal, Nature.com)
"Language: All digital communications require a formal language, which in this context consists of all the information that the sender and receiver of the digital communication must both possess, in advance, in order for the communication to be successful." (Wikipedia: Digital Data)
"It is only at the semantic level that we really have meaningful information; thus, we may establish the following theorem: Theorem 14: Any entity, to be accepted as information, must entail semantics; it must be meaningful. Semantics is an essential aspect of information because the meaning is the only invariant property. The statistical and syntactical properties can be altered appreciably when information is represented in another language (e.g., translated into Chinese), but the meaning does not change. Meanings always represent mental concepts; therefore, we have: Theorem 15: When its progress along the chain of transmission events is traced backward, every piece of information leads to a mental source, the mind of the sender." Dr. Werner Gitt (Former Head of the Department of Information Technology at Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany)
Modern scientific discoveries in Genetics (i.e. biology) have shown that functional / coded / digital Information (i.e. DNA code) is at the core of ALL Biological Systems. Without functional / coded / digital information, there is NO biology. The only known source (i.e. cause) in the universe that has been Observed (i.e. Scientific Method) in nature to be capable of producing functional / coded / digital information, such as that found even in the most primitive biological systems, is mind / consciousness / intelligence. --- Rod Dacanay
”The instructions in a gene that tell the cell how to make a specific protein. A, C, G, and T are the 'letters' of the DNA code; they stand for the chemicals adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T), respectively, that make up the nucleotide bases of DNA. Each gene's code combines the four chemicals in various ways to spell out three-letter "words" that specify which amino acid is needed at every step in making a protein.”* ( “Genetic Code" - National Human Genome Research Institute. Genome.gov)
”Genetic code is the term we use for the way that the four bases of DNA--the A, C, G, and Ts--are strung together in a way that the cellular machinery, the ribosome, can read them and turn them into a protein. In the genetic code, each three nucleotides in a row count as a triplet and code for a single amino acid. So each sequence of three codes for an amino acid. And proteins are made up of sometimes hundreds of amino acids. So the code that would make one protein could have hundreds, sometimes even thousands, of triplets contained in it.”_* (Lawrence C. Brody, Ph.D., Genome.gov)
"The discovery of the structure of DNA transformed biology profoundly, catalysing the sequencing of the human genome and engendering a new view of biology as an INFORMATION SCIENCE. Two features of DNA structure account for much of its remarkable impact on science: its DIGITAL nature and its complementarity, whereby one strand of the helix binds perfectly with its partner. DNA has two types of DIGITAL INFORMATION — the genes that ENCODE proteins, which are the MOLECULAR MACHINES of life, and the GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS that specify the behaviour of the genes." (Source: Nature Journal, Nature.com)
"Language: All digital communications require a formal language, which in this context consists of all the information that the sender and receiver of the digital communication must both possess, in advance, in order for the communication to be successful." (Wikipedia: Digital Data)
"It is only at the semantic level that we really have meaningful information; thus, we may establish the following theorem: Theorem 14: Any entity, to be accepted as information, must entail semantics; it must be meaningful. Semantics is an essential aspect of information because the meaning is the only invariant property. The statistical and syntactical properties can be altered appreciably when information is represented in another language (e.g., translated into Chinese), but the meaning does not change. Meanings always represent mental concepts; therefore, we have: Theorem 15: When its progress along the chain of transmission events is traced backward, every piece of information leads to a mental source, the mind of the sender." Dr. Werner Gitt (Former Head of the Department of Information Technology at Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany)
Modern scientific discoveries in Genetics (i.e. biology) have shown that functional / coded / digital Information (i.e. DNA code) is at the core of ALL Biological Systems. Without functional / coded / digital information, there is NO biology. The only known source (i.e. cause) in the universe that has been Observed (i.e. Scientific Method) in nature to be capable of producing functional / coded / digital information, such as that found even in the most primitive biological systems, is mind / consciousness / intelligence. --- Rod Dacanay
A person does Not need to have a Phd (or even an undergraduate degree) to question the validity of the Abiogenesis Hypothesis, or any hypothesis. As long as people have an understanding of basic scientific principles, common sense, and open mindedness to seek the truth, they can come to a more accurate conclusion for themselves.
Basic Science 101:
Wikipedia 2021, “A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the SCIENTIFIC METHOD requires that one can TEST IT … Even though the words "hypothesis" and "theory" are often used synonymously, a scientific hypothesis is NOT the same as a scientific theory.” Hypothesis is also referred to as a Hypothetical or Educated GUESS.
Wikipedia 2021, "In evolutionary biology, abiogenesis, or informally the origin of life (OoL),is the natural process by which life has arisen from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds. While the details of this process ARE STILL UNKNOWN, the prevailing scientific HYPOTHESIS is that the transition from non-living to living entities was not a single event ... There are several principles and HYPOTHESES for how abiogenesis COULD HAVE occurred."
Wikipedia 2021, "The RNA world is a HYPOTHETICAL stage in the evolutionary history of life on Earth, in which self-replicating RNA molecules proliferated before the evolution of DNA and proteins. The term also refers to the HYPOTHESIS that posits the existence of this stage.."
One of the reasons that abiogensis and RNA World are merely "hypotheses" and have not advanced to the status of being "scientific theories", is that abiogenesis and RNA World hypotheses still lack the experimental data required by the scientific method. Abiogenesis and RNA World Hypotheses have passed the scientific method process zero (0) times.
Basic Science 101:
Wikipedia 2021, “A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the SCIENTIFIC METHOD requires that one can TEST IT … Even though the words "hypothesis" and "theory" are often used synonymously, a scientific hypothesis is NOT the same as a scientific theory.” Hypothesis is also referred to as a Hypothetical or Educated GUESS.
Wikipedia 2021, "In evolutionary biology, abiogenesis, or informally the origin of life (OoL),is the natural process by which life has arisen from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds. While the details of this process ARE STILL UNKNOWN, the prevailing scientific HYPOTHESIS is that the transition from non-living to living entities was not a single event ... There are several principles and HYPOTHESES for how abiogenesis COULD HAVE occurred."
Wikipedia 2021, "The RNA world is a HYPOTHETICAL stage in the evolutionary history of life on Earth, in which self-replicating RNA molecules proliferated before the evolution of DNA and proteins. The term also refers to the HYPOTHESIS that posits the existence of this stage.."
One of the reasons that abiogensis and RNA World are merely "hypotheses" and have not advanced to the status of being "scientific theories", is that abiogenesis and RNA World hypotheses still lack the experimental data required by the scientific method. Abiogenesis and RNA World Hypotheses have passed the scientific method process zero (0) times.
"Scientists at the highest levels of academia are (whether negligently or intentionally deceptively to mislead in forwarding a particular ideological / worldview agenda) tossing around the words 'hypothesis' and 'theory' as interchangeable synonyms.
This has caused much confusion within the general population regarding many important scientific subjects such as Cosmology, Origin of Life (OoL), Macro-evolution, Micro-evolution, etc. which have tremendous social, political, and religious implications.
--- Rod Dacanay
"Scientists at the highest levels of academia are (whether negligently or intentionally deceptively to mislead in forwarding a particular ideological / worldview agenda) tossing around the words 'hypothesis' and 'theory' as interchangeable synonyms.
This has caused much confusion within the general population regarding many important scientific subjects such as Cosmology, Origin of Life (OoL), Macro-evolution, Micro-evolution, etc. which have tremendous social, political, and religious implications.
--- Rod Dacanay
One of World's Leading
Synthetic Organic Chemists, James Tour:
The Origin of Life Has NOT Been Explained
Are Darwinian Evolution (i.e. Macro-Evolution) and Micro-Evolution the same thing?
Mainstream misinformation / disinformation propaganda has cloudied these distinctly different issues for decades. Darwinian Macro-Evolution (i.e. Common Descent of ALL biological systems) has NOT been confirmed through the scientific method. It is un-observable, presumably because it may have occurred over a span of millions/billions of years. Additionally, Macro-Evolution has NOT been observed in nature to the present. On the other hand, Micro-Evolution HAS been confirmed through the scientific method and IS observable in nature to the present.
Abiogenesis Hypothesis may be seen as a modern derivative of the Spontaneous Generation Hypothesis (i.e. life arising from non-living matter), one of the main differences being the supposed time frames of each experimentally unproven process. Generally, the Spontaneous Generation Hypothesis speculated that living organisms “spontaneously” (i.e. within a relatively short period of time) emerged from non-living matter. And, Abiogenesis hypothesizes that un-directed random natural processes caused molecules to form into biological life by random chance over the span of millions / billions of years. Spontaneous Generation Hypothesis was believed to be ‘fact’ for almost 2000 years, until it was scientifically disproved by experiments from such scientists as Louis Pasteur in the 1800's. From Wikipedia 2021, "In evolutionary biology, abiogenesis, or informally the origin of life (OoL),is the natural process by which life has arisen from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds. While the details of this process ARE STILL UNKNOWN, the prevailing scientific HYPOTHESIS is that the transition from non-living to living entities was not a single event ... There are several principles and HYPOTHESES for how abiogenesis COULD HAVE occurred." If abiogenesis (and macro-evolution) was a real natural process, nothing should be preventing the abiogenesis (and macro-evolution) of completely novel species, at some stage of formation, from still happening today. However, to date, abiogenesis (and macro-evolution) has NOT been observed in nature. Only biogenesis (and micro-evolution) has been observed in nature. One of the reasons that abiogensis is merely a "hypothesis" and has not advanced to the status of being a "scientific theory", is that abiogenesis hypotheses still lack the experimental data required by the scientific method. Abiogenesis Hypothesis has passed the scientific method process zero (0) times.
Why is Darwin's macro-evolution speculations on the hypothetical common descent of all biological systems from a single celled common ancestor (which is not supported by the standard scientific method, the historical scientific method (i.e. there are no "presently acting causes" that support a common descent belief), Gene Regulatory Network mutation limitations, DNA mutation plasticity limitations, mathematical / computer modeling, information theory, etc.) referred to as a "theory" by the scientific community? Most importantly, the common descent illusion is not supported by the fossil record as revealed in the Cambrian geological layer.
Charles Darwin's out-dated 1800's self-proclaimed "theory" of common descent macro-evolution from the materialist ideology / worldview DOES NOT meet the present day definition requirements of being a "Scientific Theory" in modern science and should be immediately downgraded by the modern scientific community.
[Just a thought: Even though Darwin's Theory of Evolution is widely accepted as "fact", just as the Theory of Spontaneous Generation had been, by mainstream scientists of the time, would it be prudent to base one's eternal existence upon the conclusions of a 22 year old amateur naturalist (who openly expressed serious doubts about his own theory) whose ideas are founded from his observations of nature for only about 1 month in 1835 and on the 300 B.C. Theory of Spontaneous Generation that has since been proven to be false by modern science? ... You decide.]
“When we descend to details, we can prove that no one species has changed (i.e. we cannot prove that a single species has changed): nor can we prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the groundwork of the theory.” (Charles Darwin, 1800’s Evolution Theorist, in his letter to G. Bentham May 22, 1863)
Stephen J. Gould (Professor of paleontology from Harvard University): "The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persist as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils." Evolution's Erratic Pace," Natural History, vol. 86 (May 1987), p. 14.
"The fundamental reason why a lot of paleontologists don't care much for gradualism is
because the fossil record doesn't show gradual change
and every paleontologist has known that ever since Cuvier.
If you want to get around that you have to invoke the imperfection of the fossil record.
Every paleontologist knows that most species don't change.
That's bothersome if you are trained to believe that evolution ought to be gradual.
In fact it virtually precludes your studying the very process you went into the school to study.
Again, because you don't see it, that brings terrible distress."
(Stephen J. Gould, Professor of paleontology from Harvard University, During the question and answer session following his Hobart and William Smith College lecture, Dr. Gould was asked if there was not Stratigraphic evidence indicating gradualism)
”I will lay it on the line—there is not one such [transitional] fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.” (Colin Patterson FRS, British palaeontologist, Natural History Museum)
Charles Darwin: "(Since) innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" Origin of Species, p. 162. "Why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain: and this perhaps is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." Origin of Species, p. 293.
During a 2004 televised interview, when Bill Moyer asked if evolution has been observed (Observation is a necessary requirement of the Scientific Method), Dr. Richard Dawkins replied, "It’s just that it [macro-Evolution] hasn’t been observed while it’s happening." (Source: ‘Battle over evolution’ Bill Moyers interviews Dr. Richard Dawkins, Now, 3 December 2004, PBS network. Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the world's foremost expert on Darwinian Evolution.)
Leading atheist philosopher, Thomas Nagel, admits that, "The materialist, neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false."
"Not even one mutation has been observed that adds a little information to the genome." Dr. Lee Spetner ( American physicist who is a PhD and MD from MIT and Washington University)
"There are currently no known examples, in nature or science, where one life form will convert to a different life form (i.e. different body plan) by change in the DNA. Current understanding in the field of genetics seems to indicate that varying body plans (for example, the difference between an octopus and praying mantis) do not reside within the DNA. Genes within the DNA of a particular organism code for the different proteins required to build and allow that particular organism to function but has not been shown to determine that particular organism's primary biological architectural body plan. Therefore, no amount of random mutation of DNA will produce a new organism with a different body plan from the original." --- Rod Dacanay
Stephen J. Gould (Professor of paleontology from Harvard University): "The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persist as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils." Evolution's Erratic Pace," Natural History, vol. 86 (May 1987), p. 14.
"The fundamental reason why a lot of paleontologists don't care much for gradualism is
because the fossil record doesn't show gradual change
and every paleontologist has known that ever since Cuvier.
If you want to get around that you have to invoke the imperfection of the fossil record.
Every paleontologist knows that most species don't change.
That's bothersome if you are trained to believe that evolution ought to be gradual.
In fact it virtually precludes your studying the very process you went into the school to study.
Again, because you don't see it, that brings terrible distress."
(Stephen J. Gould, Professor of paleontology from Harvard University, During the question and answer session following his Hobart and William Smith College lecture, Dr. Gould was asked if there was not Stratigraphic evidence indicating gradualism)
”I will lay it on the line—there is not one such [transitional] fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.” (Colin Patterson FRS, British palaeontologist, Natural History Museum)
Charles Darwin: "(Since) innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" Origin of Species, p. 162. "Why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain: and this perhaps is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." Origin of Species, p. 293.
During a 2004 televised interview, when Bill Moyer asked if evolution has been observed (Observation is a necessary requirement of the Scientific Method), Dr. Richard Dawkins replied, "It’s just that it [macro-Evolution] hasn’t been observed while it’s happening." (Source: ‘Battle over evolution’ Bill Moyers interviews Dr. Richard Dawkins, Now, 3 December 2004, PBS network. Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the world's foremost expert on Darwinian Evolution.)
Leading atheist philosopher, Thomas Nagel, admits that, "The materialist, neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false."
"Not even one mutation has been observed that adds a little information to the genome." Dr. Lee Spetner ( American physicist who is a PhD and MD from MIT and Washington University)
"There are currently no known examples, in nature or science, where one life form will convert to a different life form (i.e. different body plan) by change in the DNA. Current understanding in the field of genetics seems to indicate that varying body plans (for example, the difference between an octopus and praying mantis) do not reside within the DNA. Genes within the DNA of a particular organism code for the different proteins required to build and allow that particular organism to function but has not been shown to determine that particular organism's primary biological architectural body plan. Therefore, no amount of random mutation of DNA will produce a new organism with a different body plan from the original." --- Rod Dacanay
"Science is suppose to be a 'Search for the Truth'. Unfortunately, in today’s society, as with virtually all other fields of human endeavor (including Religion), the field of 'Science' has been corrupted by profit, politics, and ideological / worldview agenda where misinformation and disinformation proliferate to propagandize the world. It seems like many of the world's top scientists have reached the level of stardom once reserved for celebrities, rock stars, and Heads of State. Some of these scientists have made millions through book sales, movies, lectures, etc. by sharing their beliefs and interpretations of the world, which may not be based on science. These scientists have a direct financial and ideological conflict of interest in sharing supposed "scientific truths" as advisors to governments in shaping policy or to the public for indoctrination."
---Rod Dacanay
1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
---Rod Dacanay
1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
Daniel 1:4
Children in whom was no blemish, but well favored, and skillful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king's palace, and whom they might teach the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans.
1Timothy 6:20
O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
Children in whom was no blemish, but well favored, and skillful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king's palace, and whom they might teach the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans.
1Timothy 6:20
O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
Regarding the timeline of creation stated in Genesis 1 of the Bible, many people think that creation occurred within a 7 "earth-day" period. However, if one reads the actual text of the Bible carefully, it is very clear that the “days” mentioned in Genesis 1 are not referring to the assumed 24-hour earth- days with which we are all accustomed. Because, what is a “day” on earth? Isn’t a "earth-day” the single revolution of the earth around its axis? (By the way, science has shown that the rotation of the earth has not been constant over earth's history. Additionally, every celestial body has a different length for its "day".) According to the Bible, the Earth was not "formed" until the 3rd day of creation. Prior to the 3rd day of creation, the earth was "without form and void". So, how could an "unformed" earth have rotated about its non-existent axis during the first two days of creation to provide a measure of time? Clearly, God was using a different measure of time for a “day” during the “seven days of creation”. In other words, God was not using an “earth-day” as a unit measure of time during creation. To think that God would use an "earth-based time clock" to measure the creation of the universe is akin to the out-dated geocentric belief that the universe revolves around the earth. Even though God is everywhere at all times, God did not have to be "on" earth [Obviously, since the earth had not even been formed until the third "day" of creation.] and therefore not limited by an earthly time frame, when He created the heavens and the earth. (By the way, when was the clock invented? When was the unit measure of time for a second, a minute, an hour, a 24-hour day established? These are all relatively new innovations. So, how could they have measured time at the moment of creation.) God is beyond heaven, earth ... and time.
According to modern discoveries in Quantum Physics, without Electromagnetism (Light), there is No atom, No matter, and No cosmos. Electromagnetism (Light) brings the physical universe into existence.
Genesis 1:3
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
1 John 1:5
This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
John 1:1-5
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
1 John 1:5
This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
John 1:1-5
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
"Information doesn't create the cosmos. Information waves are the fabric of the cosmos. And, as demonstrated with the famous double slit experiment, a conscious observer converts those information waves of potentiality / probability into 'particle', 'matter', or 'cosmos'. The Prime Observer creates the Cosmos. Matter cannot exist without physical laws and constants first existing. Physical laws and constants cannot exist without mind / consciousness / intelligence first existing. Mind / consciousness / intelligence is Prime. Mind Exists Before Matter. Mind Over Matter."
--- Rod Dacanay
"Information doesn't create the cosmos. Information waves are the fabric of the cosmos. And, as demonstrated with the famous double slit experiment, a conscious observer converts those information waves of potentiality / probability into 'particle', 'matter', or 'cosmos'. The Prime Observer creates the Cosmos. Matter cannot exist without physical laws and constants first existing. Physical laws and constants cannot exist without mind / consciousness / intelligence first existing. Mind / consciousness / intelligence is Prime. Mind Exists Before Matter. Mind Over Matter."
--- Rod Dacanay
GENESIS 1
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13 And the evening and the morning were the third day...
"An especially unusual version of the observer effect occurs in quantum mechanics, as best demonstrated by the double-slit experiment. Physicists have found that even passive observation of quantum phenomena (by changing the test apparatus and passively "ruling out" all but one possibility) can actually change the measured result. Despite the "observer" in this experiment being an electronic detector—possibly due to the assumption that the word "observer" implies a person—its results have led to the popular belief that a conscious mind can directly affect reality.[3] The need for the "observer" to be conscious is not supported by scientific research, and has been pointed out as a misconception rooted in a poor understanding of the quantum wave function ψ and the quantum measurement process, apparently being the generation of information at its most basic level that produces the effect." (Wikipedia: Observer Effect)
An electronic detector is a tool created by and for a conscious observer. Without a conscious observer, the electronic detector, its parameter settings, and its measurements do not exist. The electronic detector becomes an extension of the conscious observer. In the same way, a telescope and microscope are merely extensions of the conscious observer. However, it is the the Conscious Observer that is fundamental.
"It is curious how Max Plank's (the Father of Quantum Physics) conclusions were so revolutionary in the field of science / physics (i.e. the immaterial (non-material) reality of nature and 'the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind' as the ultimate force behind the fabric of reality). Yet, when microbiologists. biologists, geneticists, biochemists, other scientists, etc. come to the same conclusion, based on empirical data (i.e. Intelligence / consciousness / mind is an integral and fundamental force behind the initial introduction and subsequent propagation of biological systems), they are rebuffed as being 'unscientific'." --- Rod Dacanay
"Matter cannot exist without physical laws and constants first existing. Physical laws and constants cannot exist without mind / consciousness / intelligence first existing. Mind / consciousness / intelligence is Prime. Consciousness and Intelligence exists before matter. Mind Over Matter." --- Rod Dacanay
There are over 7.1 Billion people on earth. Of those 7.1 Billion people, it is estimated that almost 90% of them believe in a god.
There are over 2.1 Billion people on earth who profess to be Christian. (As a frame of reference, keep in mind that there are approx. 300 million people who live in the U.S. So if you take every man, woman, and child living in the U.S. and multiply that number by 7, then that is the approximate number of professed Christians on earth.)
There are over 2.1 Billion people on earth who profess to be Christian. (As a frame of reference, keep in mind that there are approx. 300 million people who live in the U.S. So if you take every man, woman, and child living in the U.S. and multiply that number by 7, then that is the approximate number of professed Christians on earth.)
According to God, our whole purpose for existence is to ... fear Him and keep his commandments.
Ecclesiastes 12:13
Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
What does it mean to “Fear God”?
God's word teaches us that the “Fear of the Lord” is to “hate evil”.
Proverbs 8:13
The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.
In essence, our whole purpose for existence is to hate evil, and keep God's word.
We may know the 10 commandments given to us by God through Moses. But, what are all of God’s commandments?
Matthew 22:36-38
36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
If we say that we love God but are not keeping his words, then we are lying to God and to ourselves. To love God is not an emotion or saying: it is an act.
Isaiah 29:13
Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honor me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:
Matthew 15:8
This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoreth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.
1John 2:15
Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
Luke 16:13
No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
1John 4:20
If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
Mark 7:9
And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
1John 3:18
My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.
Isaiah 29:13
Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honor me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:
Matthew 15:8
This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoreth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.
1John 2:15
Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
Luke 16:13
No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
1John 4:20
If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
Mark 7:9
And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
1John 3:18
My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.
Leading Investigative Journalist, Who is Atheist,
Investigates God and Converts after Findings
The Principle of "Doubting Thomas" : Although a majority of people can come to the knowledge of the Truth without "science", God knows that there is a percentage of the population that require empirical data / evidence in order to accept the Truth. Hence, Christ returned to provide "Doubting Thomas" with the empirical data / evidence that Apostle Thomas needed to believe. --- Rod Dacanay
What does it mean to “love God”. Just because we may say, “I love you, Lord”, does not mean that we really love him. Going to church every week does not mean that we love God. To truly love God means that we keep his commandments and his words.
John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
John 14:23
Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
1John 5:3
For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.
2John 1:6
And this is love, that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.
John 15:10
If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.
1John 2:5
But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him.
1John 4:19
We love him, because he first loved us.
John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
John 14:23
Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
1John 5:3
For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.
2John 1:6
And this is love, that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.
John 15:10
If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.
1John 2:5
But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him.
1John 4:19
We love him, because he first loved us.
Top Atheist Scientist and Head of the Human Genome Project, Francis Collins,
Converts to Christianity Because of Science
A person can do good works by hating evil, but if they aren't keeping God's word then they aren't fulfilling their duty to God.
Deuteronomy 5:29
O that there were such an heart in them, that they would fear me, and keep all my commandments always, that it might be well with them, and with their children for ever!
So, what happens after we hate evil and keep God's word? Are we all suppose to just be born, grow up, get a job, get married, have a family, retire, then die? Is that all there is to life?...
(Click the "Life after Death" Tab on the side of this page to learn more.)
Deuteronomy 5:29
O that there were such an heart in them, that they would fear me, and keep all my commandments always, that it might be well with them, and with their children for ever!
So, what happens after we hate evil and keep God's word? Are we all suppose to just be born, grow up, get a job, get married, have a family, retire, then die? Is that all there is to life?...
(Click the "Life after Death" Tab on the side of this page to learn more.)
Albert Einstein's religious views have been widely studied and often misunderstood.[1] Albert Einstein stated that he believed in the pantheistic God of Baruch Spinoza.[2] He did not believe in a personal God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings, a view which he described as naïve.[3] He clarified however that, "I am not an atheist",[4] preferring to call himself an agnostic,[5] or a "religious nonbeliever."[3] Einstein also stated he did not believe in life after death, adding "one life is enough for me."[6] He was closely involved in his lifetime with several humanist groups.[7][8] (Source: Wikipedia)
"Laws of the Universe exist Independent of anyone's personal beliefs in the existence of the Laws of the Universe. Just as man-made laws govern society globally, Universal Laws govern the entire Universe. Un-directed random material natural processes have never been observed or experimentally demonstrated to be capable of producing any form of laws. As scientifically confirmed, non-material laws are the product of only Mind / Consciousness / Intelligence."
---Rod Dacanay
"World's Most Notorious Atheist" and World's Iconic Champion Advocate of Atheism for over 50 years, Anthony Flew, finally accepts the existence of God due to Modern Scientific discoveries
“I now believe that the universe was brought into existence by an infinite Intelligence. I believe that this universe’s intricate laws manifest what scientists have called the Mind of God. I believe that life and reproduction originate in a divine Source. Why do I believe this, given that I expounded and defended atheism for more than a half century? The short answer is this: this is the world picture, as I see it, that has emerged from
MODERN SCIENCE.”
---Antony Flew, “World’s Most Notorious Atheist” and World’s Icon and Champion Advocate for Atheism for over 50 years
MODERN SCIENCE.”
---Antony Flew, “World’s Most Notorious Atheist” and World’s Icon and Champion Advocate for Atheism for over 50 years
1CORINTHIANS 13
1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.
3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.
4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,
5 Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;
7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.
9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
13 And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.
3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.
4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,
5 Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;
7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.
9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
13 And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
World's Leading Darwinian Evolutionary and Agnostic Scientist, Richard Dawkins,
Proves Universal Intelligence in 5 Minutes
JOHN 1
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
The Detrimental Effects of Darwinian Ideology and Materialist Worldview on Society and Humanity
"Darwinism, and by extension Social Darwinism,
fabricates the false scientific justification for racism and war."
---Rod Dacanay
"The Common Thread in World Wars and Perpetual Wars is Social Darwinism,
'Survival of the Fittest' Among Nations (i.e. the continuous Godless struggle for world resource wealth and world rule without regard to moral / ethical standards or U.S. / International Law)"
---Rod Dacanay
"Belief in a strictly materialistic Darwinian Evolution ideology leads one to believe, albeit falsely,
that there is no Free Will. And if there is no Free Will, then there is no Right and Wrong and no Moral Law. However, this belief is completely contrary to everything that is practiced and observed in nature, humanity, and the cosmos regarding cause and effect. This Darwinian line of reasoning is what led to the atrocities of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc and is the hidden, underlying ideology / worldview justifying and directing many countries' domestic and foreign policies to the present."
---Rod Dacanay
During an on stage discussion with Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins admits, "I have a materialist view of the world ... so that commits me to the view that when I think I have free will ... I'm deluding myself." (Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the world's foremost expert
on Darwinian Evolution.)
fabricates the false scientific justification for racism and war."
---Rod Dacanay
"The Common Thread in World Wars and Perpetual Wars is Social Darwinism,
'Survival of the Fittest' Among Nations (i.e. the continuous Godless struggle for world resource wealth and world rule without regard to moral / ethical standards or U.S. / International Law)"
---Rod Dacanay
"Belief in a strictly materialistic Darwinian Evolution ideology leads one to believe, albeit falsely,
that there is no Free Will. And if there is no Free Will, then there is no Right and Wrong and no Moral Law. However, this belief is completely contrary to everything that is practiced and observed in nature, humanity, and the cosmos regarding cause and effect. This Darwinian line of reasoning is what led to the atrocities of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc and is the hidden, underlying ideology / worldview justifying and directing many countries' domestic and foreign policies to the present."
---Rod Dacanay
During an on stage discussion with Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins admits, "I have a materialist view of the world ... so that commits me to the view that when I think I have free will ... I'm deluding myself." (Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the world's foremost expert
on Darwinian Evolution.)
”What's to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn't right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.” Richard Dawkins, the Atheist Evangelist", by Larry Taunton, by Faith (18 December 2007)
"Countries' indoctrination of the masses in the pseudo-science of Darwinian Common Descent Macro-evolution, has continued to breed false scientific justification for racism and war
in the modern era for over a century."
--- Rod Dacanay
"The Social Darwinian Materialistic Ideology / Worldview (Survival of the Fittest among nations,
i.e. the continuous lawless struggle for resource wealth and world rule without regard to
human moral / ethical standards or International / U.S. Laws) is the
Root Cause of Modern Era World Wars and Perpetual Wars."
--- Rod Dacanay
If a person does nothing else their entire life, he/she should read, study, examine, research the entire Bible (most accurate word for word translation available) from beginning to end, with an open and prayerful spirit: and, ask, consult God, (Yahuah), the Author, for knowledge, understanding, and wisdom in His Word as well as His Spirit to live His Word.
"The more I study the Bible, the more I understand Science."
--- Rod Dacanay
"The more I study the Bible, the more I understand Science."
--- Rod Dacanay
The Lord's Prayer
Matthew 6
9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
11 Give us this day our daily bread.
12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
13 And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever. Amen.
